This one didn’t assist calm the “Chiefs get all of the calls” narrative.
Kansas Metropolis used a controversial non-call Sunday night time to flee with a 22-17 highway win over the Falcons, only one week after a late go interference arrange a game-winning area purpose in opposition to the Bengals.
The Chiefs (3-0) appeared to get away with a go interference on tight finish Kyle Pitts ultimately zone on a third-and-5 with lower than 5 minutes to go whereas nursing a five-point lead.
Falcons coach Raheem Morris appeared fairly tiffed with the referees’ inaction.
“I like my cash,” Morris stated. “I like my cash that Arthur Clean provides me. I’m very sensible sufficient to remember sufficient to speak about officers. They made the decision or they didn’t make the decision, it’s what it’s. We had an opportunity to win the soccer recreation on the final play of the sport.”
The back-to-back champion Chiefs are in that territory the place they’re believed to be benefactors of every name, with loads of notable flags or non-flags going their means in recent times.
The fourth-down defensive go interference in Week 2 allowed them to keep away from an upset and this non-call saved them from one other upset Sunday, though the Falcons had different probabilities to win.
With the Falcons on the Chiefs’ six-yard line with a bit greater than 4 minutes remaining, quarterback Kirk Cousins lofted a go to Pitts ultimately zone.
As Pitts got here again to the ball, Chiefs security Bryan Prepare dinner clearly bought a hand round Pitts’ waist and made contact earlier than the ball arrived.
Pitts couldn’t corral the go, and the Falcons in the end turned the ball over on downs.
“That may be a real-time name that officers must make a judgment on,” referee Tra Blake stated in a pool report, in keeping with NFL Community. “From the angle that that they had on the time, they didn’t really feel there was a foul dedicated.”
He added: “We do the perfect we are able to to make that call.”
Cousins wished he might have a do-over whereas referencing how there probably might have been a flag.
“I didn’t have a superb viewpoint on it,” Cousins stated. “It was robust. … In hindsight, if I might have the play over once more, I both would have gotten to Kyle earlier or if had been to get to him as late as I did, put the ball up greater and to not even actually put it within the refs’ palms at that time.”
The Falcons (1-2) nonetheless had an opportunity to win the sport on their ensuing drive once they drove the ball to the Chiefs’ 13-yard line, however back-to-back runs for zero and minus-three yards ended that drive.
Followers took to X to share their displeasure with the decision, particularly because it benefitted the Chiefs.
One fan wrote: “Kyle Pitts will get bear hugged throughout this catch try and the refs nonetheless don’t name a penalty for Move Interference. I can’t make this clear sufficient, the Chiefs PAY the refs to WIN.”
One other commented: “Each primetime chiefs recreation has a play like that go interference on pitts that they profit from. the primary recreation of the yr, their defensive coordinator was allowed to name a timeout for some purpose.”
